respect annotation-only declarations in infer_place_load

crates/ty_python_semantic/resources/mdtest/scopes/nonlocal.md

@@ -31,17 +31,17 @@ def f():
             reveal_type(x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
 ```
 
-## Skips annotation-only assignment
+## Reads respect annotation-only declarations
 
 ```py
 def f():
-    x = 1
+    x: int = 1
     def g():
-        # it's pretty weird to have an annotated assignment in a function where the
-        # name is otherwise not defined; maybe should be an error?
-        x: int
+        # TODO: This example should actually be an unbound variable error. However to avoid false
+        # positives, we'd need to analyze `nonlocal x` statements in other inner functions.
+        x: str
         def h():
-            reveal_type(x)  # revealed: Unknown | Literal[1]
+            reveal_type(x)  # revealed: str
 ```
 
 ## The `nonlocal` keyword
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ def f():
             nonlocal x  # error: [invalid-syntax] "no binding for nonlocal `x` found"
 ```
 
-## `nonlocal` bindings respect declared types from the defining scope, even without a binding
+## Assigning to a `nonlocal` respects the declared type from its defining scope, even without a binding in that scope
 
 ```py
 def f():