Refactor CallOutcome to Result (#16161)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -244,10 +244,7 @@ class B:
|
||||
def __rsub__(self, other: A) -> B:
|
||||
return B()
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: this should be `B` (the return annotation of `B.__rsub__`),
|
||||
# because `A.__sub__` is annotated as only accepting `A`,
|
||||
# but `B.__rsub__` will accept `A`.
|
||||
reveal_type(A() - B()) # revealed: A
|
||||
reveal_type(A() - B()) # revealed: B
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Callable instances as dunders
|
||||
@@ -263,7 +260,10 @@ class B:
|
||||
__add__ = A()
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: this could be `int` if we declare `B.__add__` using a `Callable` type
|
||||
reveal_type(B() + B()) # revealed: Unknown | int
|
||||
# TODO: Should not be an error: `A` instance is not a method descriptor, don't prepend `self` arg.
|
||||
# Revealed type should be `Unknown | int`.
|
||||
# error: [unsupported-operator] "Operator `+` is unsupported between objects of type `B` and `B`"
|
||||
reveal_type(B() + B()) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration test: numbers from typeshed
|
||||
@@ -277,22 +277,14 @@ return annotations from the widening, and preserve a bit more precision here?
|
||||
reveal_type(3j + 3.14) # revealed: int | float | complex
|
||||
reveal_type(4.2 + 42) # revealed: int | float
|
||||
reveal_type(3j + 3) # revealed: int | float | complex
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO should be int | float | complex, need to check arg type and fall back to `rhs.__radd__`
|
||||
reveal_type(3.14 + 3j) # revealed: int | float
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO should be int | float, need to check arg type and fall back to `rhs.__radd__`
|
||||
reveal_type(42 + 4.2) # revealed: int
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO should be int | float | complex, need to check arg type and fall back to `rhs.__radd__`
|
||||
reveal_type(3 + 3j) # revealed: int
|
||||
reveal_type(3.14 + 3j) # revealed: int | float | complex
|
||||
reveal_type(42 + 4.2) # revealed: int | float
|
||||
reveal_type(3 + 3j) # revealed: int | float | complex
|
||||
|
||||
def _(x: bool, y: int):
|
||||
reveal_type(x + y) # revealed: int
|
||||
reveal_type(4.2 + x) # revealed: int | float
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO should be float, need to check arg type and fall back to `rhs.__radd__`
|
||||
reveal_type(y + 4.12) # revealed: int
|
||||
reveal_type(y + 4.12) # revealed: int | float
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## With literal types
|
||||
@@ -309,8 +301,7 @@ class A:
|
||||
return self
|
||||
|
||||
reveal_type(A() + 1) # revealed: A
|
||||
# TODO should be `A` since `int.__add__` doesn't support `A` instances
|
||||
reveal_type(1 + A()) # revealed: int
|
||||
reveal_type(1 + A()) # revealed: A
|
||||
|
||||
reveal_type(A() + "foo") # revealed: A
|
||||
# TODO should be `A` since `str.__add__` doesn't support `A` instances
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ reveal_type(-3 // 3) # revealed: Literal[-1]
|
||||
reveal_type(-3 / 3) # revealed: float
|
||||
reveal_type(5 % 3) # revealed: Literal[2]
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: We don't currently verify that the actual parameter to int.__add__ matches the declared
|
||||
# formal parameter type.
|
||||
reveal_type(2 + "f") # revealed: int
|
||||
# TODO: This should emit an unsupported-operator error but we don't currently
|
||||
# verify that the actual parameter to `int.__add__` matches the declared
|
||||
# formal parameter type.
|
||||
reveal_type(2 + "f") # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
|
||||
def lhs(x: int):
|
||||
reveal_type(x + 1) # revealed: int
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user