[red-knot] Ban list literals in most contexts in type expressions (#16847)
## Summary This PR reworks `TypeInferenceBuilder::infer_type_expression()` so that we emit diagnostics when encountering a list literal in a type expression. The only place where a list literal is allowed in a type expression is if it appears as the first argument to `Callable[]`, and `Callable` is already heavily special-cased in our type-expression parsing. In order to ensure that list literals are _always_ allowed as the _first_ argument to `Callabler` (but never allowed as the second, third, etc. argument), I had to do some refactoring of our type-expression parsing for `Callable` annotations. ## Test Plan New mdtests added, and existing ones updated
This commit is contained in:
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ def _(
|
||||
d: [k for k in [1, 2]], # error: [invalid-type-form] "List comprehensions are not allowed in type expressions"
|
||||
e: {k for k in [1, 2]}, # error: [invalid-type-form] "Set comprehensions are not allowed in type expressions"
|
||||
f: (k for k in [1, 2]), # error: [invalid-type-form] "Generator expressions are not allowed in type expressions"
|
||||
g: [int, str], # error: [invalid-type-form] "List literals are not allowed in this context in a type expression"
|
||||
):
|
||||
reveal_type(a) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
reveal_type(b) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
@@ -103,4 +104,5 @@ def _(
|
||||
reveal_type(d) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
reveal_type(e) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
reveal_type(f) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
reveal_type(g) # revealed: Unknown
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user