From dc4db39f782ec6c0005d19d3107a58ddb094eefb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Anselm Hahn <Anselm.Hahn@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 23:08:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: :memo: Updating the example for `assert(S101)` (#6986)

<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:

- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->

## Summary

Rewriting the `if`-comparison to focus on the meaning of rule ` assert
S101`.

Fixes #6984

## Test Plan

<!-- How was it tested? -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
---
 crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_bandit/rules/assert_used.rs | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_bandit/rules/assert_used.rs b/crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_bandit/rules/assert_used.rs
index 4112c6ae7a..6c91cb0c17 100644
--- a/crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_bandit/rules/assert_used.rs
+++ b/crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_bandit/rules/assert_used.rs
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ use ruff_text_size::Ranged;
 ///
 /// Use instead:
 /// ```python
+/// if not x > 0:
+///     raise ValueError("Expected positive value.")
+///
+/// # or even better:
 /// if x <= 0:
 ///     raise ValueError("Expected positive value.")
 /// ```