[red-knot] Add MRO resolution for classes (#14027)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -202,11 +202,7 @@ reveal_type(A() + B()) # revealed: MyString
|
||||
# N.B. Still a subtype of `A`, even though `A` does not appear directly in the class's `__bases__`
|
||||
class C(B): ...
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: we currently only understand direct subclasses as subtypes of the superclass.
|
||||
# We need to iterate through the full MRO rather than just the class's bases;
|
||||
# if we do, we'll understand `C` as a subtype of `A`, and correctly understand this as being
|
||||
# `MyString` rather than `str`
|
||||
reveal_type(A() + C()) # revealed: str
|
||||
reveal_type(A() + C()) # revealed: MyString
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Reflected precedence 2
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user