[red-knot] No cyclic-class-def diagnostics for subclasses of cyclic classes (#15561)
Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io> Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -396,11 +396,10 @@ class Foo: ...
|
||||
class BarCycle(FooCycle): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
|
||||
class Bar(Foo): ...
|
||||
|
||||
# TODO: can we avoid emitting the errors for these?
|
||||
# The classes have cyclic superclasses,
|
||||
# Avoid emitting the errors for these. The classes have cyclic superclasses,
|
||||
# but are not themselves cyclic...
|
||||
class Baz(Bar, BarCycle): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
|
||||
class Spam(Baz): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
|
||||
class Baz(Bar, BarCycle): ...
|
||||
class Spam(Baz): ...
|
||||
|
||||
reveal_type(FooCycle.__mro__) # revealed: tuple[Literal[FooCycle], Unknown, Literal[object]]
|
||||
reveal_type(BarCycle.__mro__) # revealed: tuple[Literal[BarCycle], Unknown, Literal[object]]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user