[red-knot] No cyclic-class-def diagnostics for subclasses of cyclic classes (#15561)

Co-authored-by: Dhruv Manilawala <dhruvmanila@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Micha Reiser <micha@reiser.io>
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <alex.waygood@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
wooly18
2025-01-20 21:35:29 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2a2ac8a483
commit f82ef32e53
4 changed files with 62 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@@ -396,11 +396,10 @@ class Foo: ...
class BarCycle(FooCycle): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
class Bar(Foo): ...
# TODO: can we avoid emitting the errors for these?
# The classes have cyclic superclasses,
# Avoid emitting the errors for these. The classes have cyclic superclasses,
# but are not themselves cyclic...
class Baz(Bar, BarCycle): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
class Spam(Baz): ... # error: [cyclic-class-definition]
class Baz(Bar, BarCycle): ...
class Spam(Baz): ...
reveal_type(FooCycle.__mro__) # revealed: tuple[Literal[FooCycle], Unknown, Literal[object]]
reveal_type(BarCycle.__mro__) # revealed: tuple[Literal[BarCycle], Unknown, Literal[object]]