<!--
Thank you for contributing to Ruff! To help us out with reviewing,
please consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
For example, https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/8512 doesn't need
ecosystem check
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
## Test Plan
<!-- How was it tested? -->
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8076
Follow-up to #8358
Doubles the amount of ecosystem checks we do, adding separate groups for
the stable sections.
We're likely to run into GitHub comment length restrictions if there are
significant deviations. However, it should not be common for changes in
stable and preview to occur at the same time, nor should it be common
for linter and formatter changes to occur at the same time.
Until https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/8076 is ready, it seems
beneficial to get feedback on preview mode changes.
Tested locally, updated logs to output the flags passed to `ruff` and
verified `--preview` is used.
Changes the title and adds some notes re the old formatter ecosystem
checks in light of #8223
Does not remove it as I'm not sure where else we test for instabilities.
Closes#7239
- Refactors `scripts/check_ecosystem.py` into a new Python project at
`python/ruff-ecosystem`
- Includes
[documentation](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/zanie/ecosystem-format/python/ruff-ecosystem/README.md)
now
- Provides a `ruff-ecosystem` CLI
- Fixes bug where `ruff check` report included "fixable" summary line
- Adds truncation to `ruff check` reports
- Otherwise we often won't see the `ruff format` reports
- The truncation uses some very simple heuristics and could be improved
in the future
- Identifies diagnostic changes that occur just because a violation's
fix available changes
- We still show the diff for the line because it's could matter _where_
this changes, but we could improve this
- Similarly, we could improve detection of diagnostic changes where just
the message changes
- Adds support for JSON ecosystem check output
- I added this primarily for development purposes
- If there are no changes, only errors while processing projects, we
display a different summary message
- When caching repositories, we now checkout the requested ref
- Adds `ruff format` reports, which format with the baseline then the
use `format --diff` to generate a report
- Runs all CI jobs when the CI workflow is changed
## Known problems
- Since we must format the project to get a baseline, the permalink line
numbers do not exactly correspond to the correct range
- This looks... hard. I tried using `git diff` and some wonky hunk
matching to recover the original line numbers but it doesn't seem worth
it. I think we should probably commit the formatted changes to a fork or
something if we want great results here. Consequently, I've just used
the start line instead of a range for now.
- I don't love the comment structure — it'd be nice, perhaps, to have
separate headings for the linter and formatter.
- However, the `pr-comment` workflow is an absolute pain to change
because it runs _separately_ from this pull request so I if I want to
make edits to it I can only test it via manual workflow dispatch.
- Lines are not printed "as we go" which means they're all held in
memory, presumably this would be a problem for large-scale ecosystem
checks
- We are encountering a hard limit with the maximum comment length
supported by GitHub. We will need to move the bulk of the report
elsewhere.
## Future work
- Update `ruff-ecosystem` to support non-default projects and
`check_ecosystem_all.py` behavior
- Remove existing ecosystem check scripts
- Add preview mode toggle (#8076)
- Add a toggle for truncation
- Add hints for quick reproduction of runs locally
- Consider parsing JSON output of Ruff instead of using regex to parse
the text output
- Links to project repositories should use the commit hash we checked
against
- When caching repositories, we should pull the latest changes for the
ref
- Sort check diffs by path and rule code only (changes in messages
should not change order)
- Update check diffs to distinguish between new violations and changes
in messages
- Add "fix" diffs
- Remove existing formatter similarity reports
- On release pull request, compare to the previous tag instead
---------
Co-authored-by: konsti <konstin@mailbox.org>
Windows tests take much longer and downstream CI jobs that require the
build from the Linux tests must wait to start.
Additionally, we already have if/else logic in the test suite for
Windows tests which cannot run the same command.
This will require an update to the required checks in the repository
settings.
Adds a CI job which runs `ruff-lsp` tests against the current Ruff
build.
Avoids rebuilding Ruff at the cost of running _after_ the cargo tests
have finished. Might be worth the rebuild to get earlier feedback but I
don't expect it to fail often?
xref https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp/pull/286
## Test plan
Verified use of the development version by inspecting version output in
CI; supported by https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff-lsp/pull/289 and
#8034
Previously attempted to repair these tests at
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/6992 but I don't think we should
prioritize that and instead I would like to remove this dead code.
From the formatter progress CI logs:
```
2023-08-07T03:49:02.5178602Z + mkdir -p /home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects
2023-08-07T03:49:02.5193474Z + '[' '!' -d /home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/build ']'
2023-08-07T03:49:02.5194228Z + '[' '!' -d /home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/django ']'
2023-08-07T03:49:02.5194966Z + git clone --filter=tree:0 https://github.com/django/django /home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/django
2023-08-07T03:49:02.5209260Z Cloning into '/home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/django'...
```
```
2023-08-07T03:51:17.4726088Z [2m2023-08-07T03:51:17.472404Z[0m [31mERROR[0m Failed /home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/build: no python files in ["/home/runner/work/ruff/ruff/target/progress_projects/build"]
```
Seems that build exists but is an empty cached folder. These changes
should fix this by a) checking for `.git` instead of just the folder
existing b) running the commit checkout unconditionally. The latter is
also important if we ever want to update the SHAs.
**Summary** Prompted by
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/6257#issuecomment-1661308410, it
tried to make the ecosystem script output on failure better
understandable. All log messages are now written to a file, which is
printed on error. Running locally progress is still shown.
Looking through the log output i saw that we currently log syntax errors
in input, which is confusing because they aren't actual errors, but we
don't check that these files don't change due to parser regressions or
improvements. I added `--files-with-errors` to catch that.
**Test Plan** CI
**Summary** Add a formatter progress testing script to CI. This script
will 1) print the black compability on each run 2) catch regressions wrt
to formatter stability, emitting invalid syntax and other kinds of bugs
(e.g. #5917) before they land on main 3) have an additional layer of
real world tests when implementing new nodes or other new formatter
code.
This is currently a bash script, i'm not sure if we want to keep it that
way, or switch to e.g. the regular ecosystem scripts. The output
separation of `format_dev` could also use some polishing. We should also
consider pinning commits so we don't get spurious regression when they
change their code.
**Test Plan** The script extends CI.
Since the (implicit) update to cargo-insta 1.30, CI would pass even when
the tests failed. This downgrades to cargo insta 1.29.0 and CI fails
again when it should (which i can't show here, because CI needs to pass
to merge this PR). I've improved the unreferenced snapshot handling in
the process
See https://github.com/mitsuhiko/insta/issues/392
## Summary
This PR migrates our `mkdocs-material` version to
[Insiders](https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/insiders/), which
we can access now that we're sponsors.
We can't allow public access to the Insiders version, so we instead have
a private fork, which contains a deploy key that I've added as a
read-only Actions secret in this repo. (That is: the deploy key only
lets you read that one repo, and do nothing else.)
In general, non-Astral contributors can use the non-insiders version,
and everything is expected to "work", but without the insiders features
(they're intended to be ignored). See:
https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/insiders/#compatibility.
## Summary
The clippy wasm job rarely fails if regular clippy doesn't, wasm clippy
still compiles a lot of native dependencies for the proc macro and we
have less CI jobs overall, so i think this an improvement to our CI.
```shell
$ CARGO_TARGET_DIR=target-wasm cargo clippy -p ruff_wasm --target wasm32-unknown-unknown --all-features -j 2 -- -D warnings
$ du -sh target-wasm/*
12K target-wasm/CACHEDIR.TAG
582M target-wasm/debug
268M target-wasm/wasm32-unknown-unknown
```
## Test plan
n/a
## Summary
Currently, it is possible to create a tag and then have the release
fail, which is a problem since we can't edit the tag
(https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/issues/4468). This change the
release process so that the tag is created inside the release workflow.
This leaves as a failure mode that we have published to pypi but then
creating the tag or GitHub release doesn't work, but in this case we can
restart and the pypi upload is just skipped because we use the skip
existing option.
The release workflow is started by a workflow dispatch with the tag
instead of creating the tag yourself. You can start the release workflow
without a tag to do a dry run which does not publish an artifacts. You
can optionally add a git sha to the workflow run and it will verify that
the release runs on the mentioned commit.
This also adds docs on how to release and a small style improvement for
the maturin integration.
## Test Plan
Testing is hard since we can't do real releases, i've tested a minimized
workflow in a separate dummy repository.
## Summary
Open cache files in parallel (again), brings the performance back to be roughly equal to the old implementation.
## Test Plan
Existing tests should keep working.
* Replace the unmaintained actions-rs/cargo that github actions
complains about using an old node version with plain cargo (this was the
original motivation for this PR)
* Use taiki-e/install-action to install critcmp directly
* Use a rust 1.70 nightly toolchain for udeps
* Cache python package build (this should cut a good chunk of ci time)
* yaml formatting courtesy of pycharm
Test Plan: CI itself
* Use taiki-e/install-action to install cargo fuzz
The cargo fuzz run seems to sometimes fail for unclear reasons (https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff/actions/runs/5200348677/jobs/9379742606?pr=4900). I hope that this might fix it. I'll push more commits to this PR to check the caching behaviour.
* Trigger CI with cache
* Change cache
* Actually use caching
* Undo cargo update
* cargo update fuzzer
* Revert rust changes
