Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dhruv Manilawala
ad1a8da4d1 [red-knot] Check for invalid overload usages (#17609)
## Summary

Part of #15383, this PR adds the core infrastructure to check for
invalid overloads and adds a diagnostic to raise if there are < 2
overloads for a given definition.

### Design notes

The requirements to check the overloads are:
* Requires `FunctionType` which has the `to_overloaded` method
* The `FunctionType` **should** be for the function that is either the
implementation or the last overload if the implementation doesn't exists
* Avoid checking any `FunctionType` that are part of an overload chain
* Consider visibility constraints

This required a couple of iteration to make sure all of the above
requirements are fulfilled.

#### 1. Use a set to deduplicate

The logic would first collect all the `FunctionType` that are part of
the overload chain except for the implementation or the last overload if
the implementation doesn't exists. Then, when iterating over all the
function declarations within the scope, we'd avoid checking these
functions. But, this approach would fail to consider visibility
constraints as certain overloads _can_ be behind a version check. Those
aren't part of the overload chain but those aren't a separate overload
chain either.

<details><summary>Implementation:</summary>
<p>

```rs
fn check_overloaded_functions(&mut self) {
    let function_definitions = || {
        self.types
            .declarations
            .iter()
            .filter_map(|(definition, ty)| {
                // Filter out function literals that result from anything other than a function
                // definition e.g., imports.
                if let DefinitionKind::Function(function) = definition.kind(self.db()) {
                    ty.inner_type()
                        .into_function_literal()
                        .map(|ty| (ty, definition.symbol(self.db()), function.node()))
                } else {
                    None
                }
            })
    };

    // A set of all the functions that are part of an overloaded function definition except for
    // the implementation function and the last overload in case the implementation doesn't
    // exists. This allows us to collect all the function definitions that needs to be skipped
    // when checking for invalid overload usages.
    let mut overloads: HashSet<FunctionType<'db>> = HashSet::default();

    for (function, _) in function_definitions() {
        let Some(overloaded) = function.to_overloaded(self.db()) else {
            continue;
        };
        if overloaded.implementation.is_some() {
            overloads.extend(overloaded.overloads.iter().copied());
        } else if let Some((_, previous_overloads)) = overloaded.overloads.split_last() {
            overloads.extend(previous_overloads.iter().copied());
        }
    }

    for (function, function_node) in function_definitions() {
        let Some(overloaded) = function.to_overloaded(self.db()) else {
            continue;
        };
        if overloads.contains(&function) {
            continue;
        }

        // At this point, the `function` variable is either the implementation function or the
        // last overloaded function if the implementation doesn't exists.

        if overloaded.overloads.len() < 2 {
            if let Some(builder) = self
                .context
                .report_lint(&INVALID_OVERLOAD, &function_node.name)
            {
                let mut diagnostic = builder.into_diagnostic(format_args!(
                    "Function `{}` requires at least two overloads",
                    &function_node.name
                ));
                if let Some(first_overload) = overloaded.overloads.first() {
                    diagnostic.annotate(
                        self.context
                            .secondary(first_overload.focus_range(self.db()))
                            .message(format_args!("Only one overload defined here")),
                    );
                }
            }
        }
    }
 }
```

</p>
</details> 

#### 2. Define a `predecessor` query

The `predecessor` query would return the previous `FunctionType` for the
given `FunctionType` i.e., the current logic would be extracted to be a
query instead. This could then be used to make sure that we're checking
the entire overload chain once. The way this would've been implemented
is to have a `to_overloaded` implementation which would take the root of
the overload chain instead of the leaf. But, this would require updates
to the use-def map to somehow be able to return the _following_
functions for a given definition.

#### 3. Create a successor link

This is what Pyrefly uses, we'd create a forward link between two
functions that are involved in an overload chain. This means that for a
given function, we can get the successor function. This could be used to
find the _leaf_ of the overload chain which can then be used with the
`to_overloaded` method to get the entire overload chain. But, this would
also require updating the use-def map to be able to "see" the
_following_ function.

### Implementation 

This leads us to the final implementation that this PR implements which
is to consider the overloaded functions using:
* Collect all the **function symbols** that are defined **and** called
within the same file. This could potentially be an overloaded function
* Use the public bindings to get the leaf of the overload chain and use
that to get the entire overload chain via `to_overloaded` and perform
the check

This has a limitation that in case a function redefines an overload,
then that overload will not be checked. For example:

```py
from typing import overload

@overload
def f() -> None: ...
@overload
def f(x: int) -> int: ...

# The above overload will not be checked as the below function with the same name
# shadows it

def f(*args: int) -> int: ...
```

## Test Plan

Update existing mdtest and add snapshot diagnostics.
2025-04-30 19:37:42 +05:30
Dhruv Manilawala
44ad201262 [red-knot] Add support for overloaded functions (#17366)
## Summary

Part of #15383, this PR adds support for overloaded callables.

Typing spec: https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html

Specifically, it does the following:
1. Update the `FunctionType::signature` method to return signatures from
a possibly overloaded callable using a new `FunctionSignature` enum
2. Update `CallableType` to accommodate overloaded callable by updating
the inner type to `Box<[Signature]>`
3. Update the relation methods on `CallableType` with logic specific to
overloads
4. Update the display of callable type to display a list of signatures
enclosed by parenthesis
5. Update `CallableTypeOf` special form to recognize overloaded callable
6. Update subtyping, assignability and fully static check to account for
callables (equivalence is planned to be done as a follow-up)

For (2), it is required to be done in this PR because otherwise I'd need
to add some workaround for `into_callable_type` and I though it would be
best to include it in here.

For (2), another possible design would be convert `CallableType` in an
enum with two variants `CallableType::Single` and
`CallableType::Overload` but I decided to go with `Box<[Signature]>` for
now to (a) mirror it to be equivalent to `overload` field on
`CallableSignature` and (b) to avoid any refactor in this PR. This could
be done in a follow-up to better split the two kind of callables.

### Design

There were two main candidates on how to represent the overloaded
definition:
1. To include it in the existing infrastructure which is what this PR is
doing by recognizing all the signatures within the
`FunctionType::signature` method
2. To create a new `Overload` type variant

<details><summary>For context, this is what I had in mind with the new
type variant:</summary>
<p>

```rs
pub enum Type {
	FunctionLiteral(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
    BoundMethod(BoundMethodType),
    ...
}

pub struct OverloadType {
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    overloads: Box<[Type]>,
	// FunctionLiteral or BoundMethod
    implementation: Option<Type>
}

pub struct BoundMethodType {
    kind: BoundMethodKind,
    self_instance: Type,
}

pub enum BoundMethodKind {
    Function(FunctionType),
    Overload(OverloadType),
}
```

</p>
</details> 

The main reasons to choose (1) are the simplicity in the implementation,
reusing the existing infrastructure, avoiding any complications that the
new type variant has specifically around the different variants between
function and methods which would require the overload type to use `Type`
instead.

### Implementation

The core logic is how to collect all the overloaded functions. The way
this is done in this PR is by recording a **use** on the `Identifier`
node that represents the function name in the use-def map. This is then
used to fetch the previous symbol using the same name. This way the
signatures are going to be propagated from top to bottom (from first
overload to the final overload or the implementation) with each function
/ method. For example:

```py
from typing import overload

@overload
def foo(x: int) -> int: ...
@overload
def foo(x: str) -> str: ...
def foo(x: int | str) -> int | str:
	return x
```

Here, each definition of `foo` knows about all the signatures that comes
before itself. So, the first overload would only see itself, the second
would see the first and itself and so on until the implementation or the
final overload.

This approach required some updates specifically recognizing
`Identifier` node to record the function use because it doesn't use
`ExprName`.

## Test Plan

Update existing test cases which were limited by the overload support
and add test cases for the following cases:
* Valid overloads as functions, methods, generics, version specific
* Invalid overloads as stated in
https://typing.python.org/en/latest/spec/overload.html#invalid-overload-definitions
(implementation will be done in a follow-up)
* Various relation: fully static, subtyping, and assignability (others
in a follow-up)

## Ecosystem changes

_WIP_

After going through the ecosystem changes (there are a lot!), here's
what I've found:

We need assignability check between a callable type and a class literal
because a lot of builtins are defined as classes in typeshed whose
constructor method is overloaded e.g., `map`, `sorted`, `list.sort`,
`max`, `min` with the `key` parameter, `collections.abc.defaultdict`,
etc. (https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/17343). This makes up
most of the ecosystem diff **roughly 70 diagnostics**. For example:

```py
from collections import defaultdict

# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(int)
# red-knot: No overload of bound method `__init__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
defaultdict(list)

class Foo:
    def __init__(self, x: int):
        self.x = x

# red-knot: No overload of function `__new__` matches arguments [lint:no-matching-overload]
map(Foo, ["a", "b", "c"])
```

Duplicate diagnostics in unpacking
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/16514) has **~16
diagnostics**.

Support for the `callable` builtin which requires `TypeIs` support. This
is **5 diagnostics**. For example:
```py
from typing import Any

def _(x: Any | None) -> None:
    if callable(x):
        # red-knot: `Any | None`
        # Pyright: `(...) -> object`
        # mypy: `Any`
        # pyrefly: `(...) -> object`
        reveal_type(x)
```

Narrowing on `assert` which has **11 diagnostics**. This is being worked
on in https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17345. For example:
```py
import re

match = re.search("", "")
assert match
match.group()  # error: [possibly-unbound-attribute]
```

Others:
* `Self`: 2
* Type aliases: 6
* Generics: 3
* Protocols: 13
* Unpacking in comprehension: 1
(https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17396)

## Performance

Refer to
https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/17366#issuecomment-2814053046.
2025-04-18 09:57:40 +05:30