This fixes the logic error that @sharkdp
[found](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/21871#discussion_r2605755588)
in the constraint set upper bound normalization logic I introduced in
#21871.
I had originally claimed that `(T ≤ α & ~β)` should simplify into `(T ≤
α) ∧ ¬(T ≤ β)`. But that also suggests that `T ≤ ~β` should simplify to
`¬(T ≤ β)` on its own, and that's not correct.
The correct simplification is that `~α` is an "atomic" type, not an
"intersection" for the purposes of our upper bound simplifcation. So `(T
≤ α & ~β)` should simplify to `(T ≤ α) ∧ (T ≤ ~β)`. That is, break apart
the elements of a (proper) intersection, regardless of whether each
element is negated or not.
This PR fixes the logic, adds a test case, and updates the comments to
be hopefully more clear and accurate.
3e00221a6c