[ruff] add fix safety section (RUF027) (#17485)

The PR add the `fix safety` section for rule `RUF027` (#15584 ).

Actually, I have an example of a false positive. Should I include it in
the` fix safety` section?

---------

Co-authored-by: Dylan <dylwil3@gmail.com>

crates/ruff_linter/src/rules/ruff/rules/missing_fstring_syntax.rs

@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ use crate::Locator;
 /// print(f"Hello {name}! It is {day_of_week} today!")
 /// ```
 ///
+/// ## Fix safety
+///
+/// This fix will always change the behavior of the program and, despite the precautions detailed
+/// above, this may be undesired. As such the fix is always marked as unsafe.
+///
 /// [logging]: https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging-cookbook.html#using-particular-formatting-styles-throughout-your-application
 /// [gettext]: https://docs.python.org/3/library/gettext.html
 /// [FastAPI path]: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/tutorial/path-params/